My Poirot parody for Captain Hastings’ fans everywhere – Hide & Seek – approaches the climax of the traditional ‘big reveal’ and before writing the final post I thought it might be a good idea to read through all the chapters first. Having made great efforts to place clues and red herrings all the way through, I didn’t want to miss out any when the great Belgian detective announces his verdict. As it happens, this turned out to be a very good idea. Not only had I forgotten some rather crucial elements of the story, I had also completely omitted all trace of one of the characters who was lined up as a possible suspect early on.
The big risk you take with blogging a story – especially something complex like a murder mystery – is you don’t get the opportunity to go back and amend mistakes, fill in plot holes or (in my case) revive neglected characters. What you are essentially presenting to the world is the first draft of something that might, one day, be a fully-fledged work of literature. Obviously, this is not going to happen with this series as the Agatha Christie Estate might get the pip about it. In fact, they would almost certainly get the pip. Which is a great shame as I enjoy writing Poirot adventures immensely. Had it not been for the fact I am supposed to be writing my own book, I might very well take Hide & Seek (and Never A Cross Word, for that matter) and polish it up into novel-worthy shape. I cannot deny that Poirot has rather hampered progress on the next PorterGirl novel, but it has not been an entirely unproductive summer. In fact, Poirot and his little grey cells have been of great service.
PorterGirl – The Vanishing Lord was published in June and I began the next novel, Sinister Dexter, within hours of its release. Whilst it was great to get a sketchy draft down while things were still fresh, it doesn’t hurt to have a break between books to ‘rest’ the characters for a little while. I would be in danger of writing something that had become a parody of itself otherwise.
Writing Poirot makes me a better writer. It is quite the responsibility to take charge of such acclaimed characters and anything less that my absolute best would be an insult. I wrote Never A Cross Word in between books and it definitely improved my writing. This time around, I wrote against type of my usual characters. There were several genuinely unpleasant characters and the nicest ones were killed off. I learned that everyone loves a villain (especially ones that get their comeuppance) and that it’s alright to break readers’ hearts once in a while.
Never mind characters having a rest, I got a bit of a rest. Doing one 1,000(ish) word post a week of fiction is a huge drop in output for me and, with my life getting increasingly busier and spread between Cambridge and London, it has been good to take off the pressure. Since June 2015, when the self-published Secret Diary Of PorterGirl was released, things have been quite brisk. By the end of 2015 I had been picked up by a publisher and First Lady Of The Keys came out in September 2016. Between then and now I have written two Poirot parodies, launched Who Shot Tony Blair? and published The Vanishing Lord, as well as appearing in horror anthology The Box Under The Bed. That is a rather respectable offering. But it is rather tiring as I do actually have a real life as well.
So I find myself well rested, well trained and at the pique of writing prowess to get on and finish Sinister Dexter. It was hoped that it would be out by the end of this year, but that seems unlikely to me. Early next year is much more realistic. I’ve got this to swot up for, after all…
2018 was planned to be a quieter year but I already have three projects aside from PorterGirl lined up, so that also seems unlikely. Then again, there is little I like more than the unlikely, so perhaps this could be a marvellous thing after all.
Lucy Brazier 
you are a powerhouse, lucy –
I just try my best and it really is amazing what you can achieve when you just try. Thank you for reading and for your kind words, it is people like you that keep me going forward. You are a star.
I find the same Lucy – that I write a poem and it seems perfect. However, on re-reading it I often come across things I would change, whether that be inserting a word, deleting one or simply shortening the work (sometimes more is less). I guess one of the problems of the internet age is that we writers now have the temptation of putting our work out there ASAP (which is often fine), however there is something to be said for the pre-internet days when manuscriI find the same Lucy – that I write a poem and it seems perfect. However, on re-reading it I often come across things I would change, whether that be inserting a word, deleting one or simply shortening the work (sometimes more is less). I guess one of the problems of the internet age is that we writers now have the temptation of putting our work out there ASAP (which is often fine), however there is something to be said for the pre-internet days when manuscripts would sit on bookshelves or in drawers prior to being revised and seeing the light of day. Best, Kevin pts would sit on bookshelves or in drawers prior to being revised and seeing the light of day. Best, Kevin
Oops, i meant less is more!
I knew what you meant!
I’m glad someone knew what I meant Lucy, as I must confess to not always knowing what I meant (smile)!
Yes, at least this way it actually gets read, even if it is warts and all. It’s a great way to write, actually, as it forces you into a disciplined schedule and you get feedback along the way – for example the death of one of the nasty characters at the request of my readers! PorterGirl benefited hugely from starting life as a blog, I was able to develop favoured characters and abandon less popular ones, tweak plots from suggestions in the comments and generally write a better final version which, as we know, are now books. Thank you for all your support and your encouraging words. All the best to you and Trigger!